Non-equilibrium effects in turbulent boundary layers over riblets: DNS of step changes in surface texture

Abstract

We computationally study the response of zero-pressure-gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) to streamwise step changes from a smooth wall to riblets (SMRI), and vice versa (RISM). To quantify the departure from equilibrium due to the step changes, we conduct reference calculations of ZPG TBLs over an entirely smooth wall, and an entirely riblet-covered surface. To save the computational cost, we generate an optimal grid for an unstructured spectral-element code, consistent with the size of turbulent scales across the TBL. By the step change, the momentum thickness Reynolds number reaches Reθ0 680 (friction Reynolds number Reτ0 283), and by the domain outlet downstream of the step change, Reθ 1000 (Reτ 400). The TBL departure from equilibrium due to the step change, and its subsequent relaxation, recall previous studies on step changes in surface roughness. Downstream of the step change, growth of the internal equilibrium layer thickness δIEL, hence recovery to equilibrium, follows two stages. Stage I corresponds to the recovery up to the buffer region (y+ 10), which is slower during the RISM step change than the SMRI counterpart. For the RISM cases during Stage I, δIEL (x/k)0.6, and this stage is completed by x 100k (5δ0 - 20δ0) downstream of the step change, where k is the riblet height. Stage II recovery i.e.\ recovery of the outer region, is quite slow. Therefore, for drag-increasing riblets with k+ 25, δIEL does not reach the boundary layer thickness, even up to 50δ0 downstream of the step change, owing to the advected frozen wake from upstream. As a result, skin-friction coefficient reaches to more than 90\% of its equilibrium counterpart, but does not reach its 100\%.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…