A Micro-Distributional Theory of the Aggregate Labor Share:Firm Size Distribution and Technological Heterogeneity
Abstract
The global decline in the labor income share has challenged the classical Kaldor facts; however, the macroeconomic aggregation mechanism -- namely, how aggregate factor shares emerge from firm-level heterogeneity -- remains underexplored. This paper bridges this gap by constructing a theoretical framework that links firm size distribution to aggregate factor shares. We extend Houthakker's aggregation theory and formalize the weighting effect: when large firms are systematically more capital-intensive than small firms, a shift in market structure toward larger firms mechanically reduces the aggregate labor share. Using comprehensive firm-level data from Chinese manufacturing (2001--2015), we empirically validate this mechanism. First, we estimate production function parameters and confirm that capital elasticity significantly exceeds labor elasticity, implying a negative relationship between firm size and labor share. Second, we find that the negative effect of firm size on labor share is significant only in industries with high technological heterogeneity. Counterfactual decomposition reveals that the shift in the size distribution toward ``superstar firms'' during 2001--2015 constitutes the primary driver of the labor share decline. Our findings provide a technical micro-foundation for the ``superstar firm'' hypothesis and highlight the distributional consequences of ``winner-take-all'' market structures.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.