Essential dimensions of polarized endomorphisms of abelian varieties

Abstract

Let f be a polarized endomorphism of an abelian variety A. Koll\'ar and Zhuang asked whether the essential dimension ed(f) equals dim(A). We provide counterexamples to this question. Instead, we prove that, under the hypothesis that every subtorus of A is f-preperiodic up to translation (a condition arising from the dynamical Manin--Mumford conjecture), we have ed(fs)=dim(A) for some integer s>0. Our examples also show the necessity of both the hypothesis and iteration. We also give an affirmative answer to Koll\'ar and Zhuang's original question when A is a simple abelian surface and f is not 2-polarized.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…