New insights into linear maps which are anti-derivable at zero

Abstract

Let A be a Banach algebra admitting a bounded approximate unit and satisfying property B. Suppose T: A → X is a continuous linear map, where X is an essential Banach A-bimodule. We prove that the following statements are equivalent: (i) T is anti-derivable at zero (i.e., a b =0 in A ⇒ T(b)· a + b· T(a) =0); (ii) There exist an element ∈ X** and a linear map (actually a bounded Jordan derivation) d: A X satisfying · a = a · ∈ X, T(a) = d(a) + · a, and d(b)· a + b· d(a)= - 2 · (b a), for all a,b∈ A with a b =0. Assuming that A is a C*-algebra we show that a bounded linear mapping T: A X is anti-derivable at zero if, and only if, there exist an element η ∈ X** and an anti-derivation d: A → X satisfying η · a = a · η ∈ X, η · [a,b] = 0 (i.e., Lη: A A, Lη (a) = η · a vanishes on commutators), and T(a) = d(a) +η · a, for all a,b ∈ A. The results are also applied for some special operator algebras.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…