Dichotomy results for classes of countable graphs
Abstract
We study classes of countable graphs where every member does not contain a given finite graph as an induced subgraph -- denoted by Free(G) for a given finite graph G. Our main results establish a structural dichotomy for such classes: If G is not an induced subgraph of P4, then Free(G) is on top under effective bi-interpretability, implying that the members of Free(G) exhibit the full range of structural and computational behaviors. In contrast, if G is an induced subgraph of P4, then Free(G) is structurally simple, as witnessed by the fact that every member satisfies the computable embeddability condition. This dichotomy is mirrored in the finite setting when one considers combinatorial and complexity-theoretic properties. Specifically, it is known that Free(G)fin is complete for graph isomorphism and not a well-quasi-order under embeddability whenever G is not an induced subgraph of P4, while in all other cases Free(G)fin forms a well-quasi-order and the isomorphism problem for Free(G)fin is solvable in polynomial time.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.