Vertex-edge domination on subclasses of bipartite graphs

Abstract

Given a simple undirected graph G = (V, E), the open neighbourhood of a vertex v ∈ V is defined as NG(v) = \u ∈ V uv ∈ E\, and the closed neighbourhood as NG[v] = NG(v) \v\. A subset D ⊂eq V is called a vertex-edge dominating set if, for every edge uv ∈ E, at least one vertex from D appears in NG[u] NG[v]; that is, (NG[u] NG[v]) D ≥ 1. Intuitively, a vertex-edge dominating set ensures that every edge, as well as all edges incident to either of its endpoints, is dominated by at least one vertex from the set. The Min-VEDS problem asks for a vertex-edge dominating set of minimum size in a given graph. This problem is known to be NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we strengthen this hardness result by proving that the problem remains NP-complete for two specific subclasses of bipartite graphs: star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. For a graph G on n vertices, it is known that the Min-VEDS problem cannot be approximated within a factor of (1 - ε) |V| for any ε > 0, unless NP ⊂eq DTIME(|V|O( |V|)). We also prove that this inapproximability result holds even for star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for computing a minimum vertex-edge dominating set in convex bipartite graphs. A polynomial-time algorithm for this graph class was also proposed by B\"uy\"ukcolak et al.~buyukccolak2025linear, but we show that their algorithm has certain flaws by providing instances where it fails to produce an optimal solution. We address this issue by presenting a modified algorithm that correctly computes an optimal solution.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…