Manifold classification from the descriptive viewpoint

Abstract

We consider classification problems for manifolds and discrete subgroups of Lie groups from a descriptive set-theoretic point of view. This work is largely foundational in conception and character, recording both a framework for general study and Borel complexity computations for some of the most fundamental classes of manifolds. We show, for example, that for all n≥ 0, the homeomorphism problem for compact topological n-manifolds is Borel equivalent to the relation =N of equality on the natural numbers, while the homeomorphism problem for noncompact topological 2-manifolds is of maximal complexity among equivalence relations classifiable by countable structures. A nontrivial step in the latter consists of proving Borel measurable formulations of the Jordan--Schoenflies and surface triangulation theorems. Turning our attention to groups and geometric structures, we show, strengthening results of Stuck--Zimmer and Andretta--Camerlo--Hjorth, that the conjugacy relation on discrete subgroups of any noncompact semisimple Lie group is essentially countable universal. So too, as a corollary, is the isometry relation for complete hyperbolic n-manifolds for any n≥ 2, generalizing a result of Hjorth--Kechris. We then show that the isometry relation for complete hyperbolic n-manifolds with finitely generated fundamental group is, in contrast, Borel equivalent to the equality relation =R on the real numbers when n=2, but that it is not concretely classifiable when n=3; thus there exists no Borel assignment of numerical complete invariants to finitely generated Kleinian groups up to conjugacy. We close with a survey of the most immediate open questions.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…