Grid designs

Abstract

We define a grid graph G as a Cartesian product of path-graphs Pn or cycle-graphs Cn as shown in Figure 1, and we ask, when can the edge set of a complete graph be expressed as a disjoint union of graphs isomorphic to G? That is, we are asking for which grid graphs a G-design exists, where a G-design is defined as a decomposition of a complete graph into edge-disjoint subgraphs isomorphic to G. We show that when n is an odd prime or the square of an odd prime, the toroidal grid-graph G = Cn Cn admits a G-design. In the less symmetrical case of products of path-graphs, we prove that G = P3 P3 does not admit a G-design but that G = P4 P4 does. This last result is the special case that motivated the present paper: a P4 P4-design corresponds to a way of successively scrambling a Connections puzzle so that each pair of words occurs adjacently exactly once. Our constructions use the arithmetic of finite fields.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…