Two conjectures in spectral hypergraph theory

Abstract

Let A be a k-th order n-dimensional tensor, and we denote by am(λ, A) the algebraic multiplicity of the eigenvalue λ of A. The projective eigenvariety Vλ(A) is defined as the set of eigenvectors of A associated with λ, considered in the complex projective space. For a connected uniform hypergraph H, let A(H) and L(H) denote its adjacency tensor and Laplacian tensor, respectively. Let be the spectral radius of A(H), for which it is known that |V(A(H))| = |V0(L(H))|. Recently, Fan [arXiv:2410.20830v2, 2024] conjectured that am(, A(H)) = |V(A(H))| and am(0, L(H)) = am(, A(H)). In this paper, we prove these two conjectures, and thereby establish am(, A(H)) = |V(A(H))| = |V0(L(H))| = am(0, L(H)). As shown by Fan et al., |V(A(H))| and |V0(L(H))| can be computed via the Smith normal form of the incidence matrix of H over Zk. Consequently, we provide a method for computing the algebraic multiplicity of the spectral radius and zero Laplacian eigenvalue for connected uniform hypergraphs.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…