Tree versus tree of preorder induced by rainbow forbidden subgraphs

Abstract

A subgraph H of an edge-colored graph G is rainbow if all the edges of H receive different colors. If G does not contain a rainbow subgraph isomorphic to H, we say that G is rainbow H-free. For connected graphs H1 and H2, if there exists an integer t=t(H1,H2) such that every rainbow H1-free edge-colored complete graph colored with t or more colors is rainbow H2-free, then we write H1 H2. The binary relation is reflexive and transitive, and hence it is a preorder. For graphs H1 and H2, we write H1 H2 if both H1 H2 and H2 H1 hold. Then is an equivalence relation. If H1 is a subgraph of H2, then trivially H1 H2 holds. On the other hand, there exists a pair (H1, H2) such that H1 is a proper supergraph of H2 and H1 H2 holds. Q.~Cui, Q.~Liu, C.~Magnant and A.~Saito [Discrete Math. 344 (2021) Article Number 112267] characterized these pairs. %On the other hand, there are few known results regarding the study of ≤ for the incomparable with respect to ⊂eq. Cui et al. found pairs of graphs H1 and H2 such that H1 ≤ H2 and H2 ≤ H1, that is, non-singleton equivalence class with respect to . However, we have not found any other non-singleton equivalence class with respect to except for those discovered by Cui et al. In this paper. we investigate the existence of non-singleton equivalence class with respect to by focusing on trees.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…