Laplacian eigenvalue conditions for edge-disjoint spanning trees and a forest with constraints

Abstract

Let k be a positive integer and let G be a simple graph of order n with minimum degree δ. A graph G is said to have property P(k, d) if it contains k edge-disjoint spanning trees and an additional forest F with edge number |E(F)| > d-1d(|V(G)| - 1), such that if F is not a spanning tree, then F has a component with at least d edges. Let D(G) be the degree diagonal matrix of G. We denote λi and μi as the ith largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix A(G) of G and the Laplacian matrix L(G) = D(G) - A(G) of G for i = 1, 2, …, n, respectively. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between Laplacian eigenvalues and property P(k, δ). Let t be a positive integer, and define Gt as the set of simple graphs such that each G ∈ Gt contains at least t+1 non-empty disjoint proper subsets V1, V2, …, Vt+1 satisfying V(G) i=1t+1 Vi ≠ and edge connectivity '(G) = e(Vi, V(G) Vi) for any i = 1, 2, …, t+1. For the class of graphs G1 with minimum degree δ, we provide a sufficient condition involving the third smallest Laplacian eigenvalue μn-2(G) for a graph G∈ G1 to have property P(k, δ). Similarly, for the class of graphs G2 with minimum degree δ, we establish a corresponding sufficient condition involving the fourth smallest Laplacian eigenvalue μn-3(G) for a graph G∈ G2 to have property P(k, δ). Furthermore, we extend the spectral conditions for all the results about μn-2(G), μn-3(G) and λ2(G) to the general graph matrices aD(G) + A(G) and aD(G) + bA(G).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…