Computational Evidence Against Quadratic-Cubic Factorization for the Second Cuboid Quintic

Abstract

Let Qp,q(t)∈Z[t] be Sharipov's even monic degree-10 second cuboid polynomial depending on coprime integers p≠ q>0. Writing Qp,q(t) as a quintic in t2 produces an associated monic quintic polynomial. After the weighted normalization r=p/q and s=r2 we obtain a one-parameter family Ps(x)∈Q[x] such that \[ Qp,q(t)=q20\,Ps\!(t2q4) s=(pq)2. \] Assuming a quadratic divisor x2+ax+b with a,b∈Q, we reduce divisibility of Ps(x) to the vanishing of an explicit remainder \[ R(x)=R1(s,a,b)\,x+R0(s,a,b). \] A key structural observation is that R1 and R0 are quadratic in b and that, on the equation R1=0, the second condition becomes linear in b. This yields a one-direction elimination to a plane obstruction curve F(s,a)=0 with F∈Z[s,a], without any lifting-back issues: when the linear coefficient is nonzero, the parameter b is forced to be the rational value b=C/L. We isolate the degenerate locus L=C=0 and show it produces only s= 1 (hence only s=1 in the cuboid domain s>0). Let C⊂P2 be the projective closure of F(s,a)=0. Using Magma we perform a height-bounded search for rational points on C. With bound H=109, the search returns 8 rational points, whose affine part has s∈\-1,0,1\. In particular, no affine rational point with s>0 and s≠ 1 is found up to this bound. This provides strong computational evidence that for rational s>0, s≠ 1, the quintic Ps(x) admits no quadratic factor over Q (equivalently, no 2+3 (quadratic-cubic) factorization over Q), and yields a conditional exclusion assuming completeness of the rational-point enumeration on C.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…