Probing the two-quasiparticle Kπ=8+ isomeric structure and enhanced stability in the proton drip-line nuclei

Abstract

Stimulated by recent experimental discoveries [Phys. Lett. B 847, 138310 (2023) and Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 072502 (2024)], two-quasiparticle Kπ=8+ isomeric structure (related to the neutron h9/2 and f7/2 orbitals) in 16076Os84 that lies at the two-proton drip line has been studied by means of the configuration-constrained potential-energy-surface calculations. Calculated results indicate that, for such an isomer, the excitation energy can be well reproduced and its oblate shape can be enhanced by the polarization effects of the two high-K orbits. Comparing with experimental data, two sets of the widely used Woods-Saxon parameters, especially, the spin-orbit coupling one, are evaluated and argued. It is found that, considering the uncertainty of the spin-orbit coupling strength, the energy crossing or inversion of the h9/2 and f7/2 neutrons can occur, which may lead to three kinds of different evolution-trends of two-quasiparticle excitation energies with the changing quadrupole deformation β2. With decreasing spin-orbit coupling interaction, the structure of the Kπ=8+ isomeric state will evolute from h9/2f7/2 ( 9/2-[505] 7/2-[503]) to the mixing of h9/2f7/2 and h9/22 ( 9/2-[505] 7/2-[514]) to h9/22, indicating that its structural probes is still of interest and an arbitrary assignment may be risky. The related theoretical calculations and experimental evidences e.g., the transition properties, are desirable. In addition, similar to that in superheavy nuclei, it is suggested that the stability inversion between high-K isomeric states and ground states might occur in this proton drip-line mass region, e.g., in the hitherto unknown nucleus 16278Pt84.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…