Late-time acceleration without a vacuum term in f(R,Lm) gravity: scaling deSitter dynamics and parameter constraints

Abstract

We investigate late-time cosmic acceleration in f(R,Lm) gravity driven by nonlinear matter contributions, focusing on the class f(R,Lm)=R/2+c1 Lm+cn Lmn+c0 with the explicit choice Lm=m and an uncoupled radiation sector. We analyze two realizations: (i) Case A: f(R,Lm)=R/2+β mn+γ, where γ acts as a vacuum term, and (ii) Case B: f(R,Lm)=R/2+β m+γ mn, where the nonlinear sector can mimic dark energy without an explicit cosmological constant. For each case, we construct a bounded autonomous system, classify all critical points and their stability, and compute cosmographic diagnostics. The phase-space analysis shows that Case A reproduces the standard radiation~Sitter sequence only for n 4/5, with acceleration essentially enforced by the vacuum term. In contrast, Case~B admits a qualitatively distinct and phenomenologically appealing branch: for 0<n<1/2 the system possesses a physical scaling de~Sitter future attractor inside the bounded simplex, yielding radiation with q=-1 and ω eff=-1 and without introducing c0. We confront both models with background data (CC, Union3, DESI BAO, plus a BBN prior on b h2) using nested sampling and perform model comparison via Bayesian evidence and AIC/BIC. The full data combination constrains n=1.080.05 in Case A and n=0.050.10 in Case B (68\% CL), the latter lying within the accelerating window while remaining statistically consistent with kinematics at the background level. We also record minimal consistency conditions for stability (tensor no-ghost and luminal propagation) and motivate a dedicated perturbation-level analysis as the next step to test growth and lensing observables.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…