Lowest eigenvalues and formally self-adjoint fourth order elliptic differential operators

Abstract

Let (M,g) be a closed, smooth, Riemannian manifold of dimension m ≥ 1. Let η be a smooth (0,1)-tensor field on M. The divergence of η is defined as divg(η):=gij(∇ η)ij. Now let g be a differential operator on M that is given on functions by g u = divg ∇ u. We will call g the Laplace-Beltrami operator. With this definition in place, it is not difficult to produce an example of a formally self-adjoint elliptic differential operator on M that has a sign-changing eigenfunction that is associated with the operator's lowest eigenvalue. Indeed, let λ2 be the second lowest eigenvalue of -g, and let Lg be a differential operator on M that is given on functions by Lg u = 2g u + λ2 u. Then Lg will possess a sign-changing eigenfunction that is associated with Lg's lowest eigenvalue.. The question that remains is given a smooth, closed manifold M of dimension m ≥ 1, how rare are formally self-adjoint elliptic differential operators on M that have sign-changing eigenfunctions that are associated with the operators' lowest eigenvalues. In this paper, we will see that if A = T -λ g, where T is a smooth, symmetric, negative semi-definite (0,2)-tensor field on M, then Pg, the differential operator on M given on functions by Pgu=,g2 - divg(A(∇ u)), will have the property that it possesses a sign-changing eigenfunction that is associated with the lowest eigenvalue of the operator. This suggests that on any smooth, closed manifold of dimension m ≥ 1 there exists a lot of formally self-adjoint fourth order elliptic differential operators on the manifold that possess sign-changing eigenfunctions that are associated with the lowest eigenvalues of the operators.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…