Endpoint Koopman Spectral Computation: L1 Residual Bounds, L∞ Instability, and Point-Spectral SCI Calibration Families

Abstract

We study endpoint Koopman spectral computation from the viewpoint of the Solvability Complexity Index (SCI). Let \(( X,d)\) be a compact metric space with finite Borel measure \(ω\), and let \( KF\) be the Koopman operator associated with a continuous nonsingular map \(F: X X\). First, on \(L1( X,ω)\), we record the endpoint residual upper-bound in the target-split form. The regularized compact fixed-\(\) target Rap,( KF) is separated from the closed fixed-\(\) target Cap,( KF) and from the exact approximate point spectrum σap( KF). This endpoint statement uses the same point-evaluation plus fixed-quadrature information model as the \(1<p<∞\) residual theory. Second, we isolate two obstructions at the nonseparable endpoint \(L∞\). Fixed quadrature schemes do not discretize the full \(L∞\) unit sphere, and even inside measure-preserving Cantor homeomorphisms the map F σap( KF:L∞ L∞) is maximally discontinuous in Hausdorff distance under arbitrarily small uniform perturbations of \(F\). We also show that finite-period Silver-tree block constructions cannot yield analytic hardness for the \(L∞\) approximate point spectrum: for a fixed non-torsion \(z0∈ T\), the condition z0∈σap( KF:L∞ L∞) collapses to a Borel unbounded-period condition. In addition, fixed \(L∞\) point-eigenvalue membership is Borel in the measure-preserving continuous class, so one fixed eigenvalue cannot encode a non-Borel tree predicate. Third, we construct Koopman point-spectrum calibration families on the Cantor space.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…