What Trace Powers Reveal About Log-Determinants: Closed-Form Estimators, Certificates, and Failure Modes

Abstract

Computing (A) for large symmetric positive definite matrices arises in Gaussian process inference and Bayesian model comparison. Standard methods combine matrix-vector products with polynomial approximations. We study a different model: access to trace powers pk = (Ak), natural when matrix powers are available. Classical moment-based approximations Taylor-expand (λ) around the arithmetic mean. This requires |λ - | < and diverges when > 4. We work instead with the moment-generating function M(t) = [Xt] for normalized eigenvalues X = λ/. Since M'(0) = [ X], the log-determinant becomes (A) = n( + M'(0)) -- the problem reduces to estimating a derivative at t = 0. Trace powers give M(k) at positive integers, but interpolating M(t) directly is ill-conditioned due to exponential growth. The transform K(t) = M(t) compresses this range. Normalization by ensures K(0) = K(1) = 0. With these anchors fixed, we interpolate K through m+1 consecutive integers and differentiate to estimate K'(0). However, this local interpolation cannot capture arbitrary spectral features. We prove a fundamental limit: no continuous estimator using finitely many positive moments can be uniformly accurate over unbounded conditioning. Positive moments downweight the spectral tail; K'(0) = [ X] is tail-sensitive. This motivates guaranteed bounds. From the same traces we derive upper bounds on ( A)1/n. Given a spectral floor r ≤ λ, we obtain moment-constrained lower bounds, yielding a provable interval for (A). A gap diagnostic indicates when to trust the point estimate and when to report bounds. All estimators and bounds cost O(m), independent of n. For m ∈ \4, …, 8\, this is effectively constant time.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…