Computational Complexity of Physical Counting

Abstract

We characterize which coordinates of a factored state space determine optimal actions. For D=(A,S,U) with S=X1×·s× Xn, coordinate set I is sufficient if sI=s'I⇒Opt(s)=Opt(s'). The decision quotient Q=S/ (s s'Opt(s)=Opt(s')) is the minimal abstraction: any abstraction preserving optimal actions factors uniquely through Q. We prove fourteen first-principles theorems (thirteen from pure mathematics, one empirical). The chain from counting measure to probability to Bayes' theorem to Q follows from finite set cardinality. Fisher information, entropy, optimal transport, rate-distortion, and thermodynamics each independently recover srank as decision complexity measure. From x≤ x-1 alone, Bayesian updating uniquely minimizes expected log loss. Complexity: SUFFICIENCY-CHECK and MINIMUM-SUFFICIENT-SET are coNP-complete; ANCHOR-SUFFICIENCY is 2P-complete; stochastic and sequential variants PP- and PSPACE-complete with strict separation. Six subcases admit polynomial algorithms. Under ETH, succinct encodings carry 2(n) lower bounds. Verification requires ≥ 2n-1 witness pairs. Two results carry empirical conditions. Conditional on Landauer's principle (kBT 2 per bit erasure; experimentally confirmed 2012), dU≥λ\,dC follows by composition with bit-operation bounds; rejecting it requires rejecting Landauer. Conditional on stochastic thermodynamics (Barato--Seifert 2015), Var(J)/ J2≥ 2/σ bounds decision precision by entropy production, minimal σ scaling with srank.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…