On the compatibility between the spatial moments and the codomain of a real random field
Abstract
While any symmetric and positive semidefinite mapping can be the non-centered covariance of a Gaussian random field, it is known that these conditions are no longer sufficient when the random field is valued in a two-point set. The question therefore arises of what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for a mapping : × to be the non-centered covariance of a random field with values in a subset of . Such conditions are presented in the general case when is a closed subset of the real line, then examined for some specific cases. In particular, if = or , it is shown that the conditions reduce to being symmetric and positive semidefinite. If is a closed interval or a two-point set, the necessary and sufficient conditions are more restrictive: the symmetry, positive semidefiniteness, upper and lower boundedness of are no longer enough to guarantee the existence of a random field valued in and having as its non-centered covariance. Similar characterizations are obtained for semivariograms and higher-order spatial moments, as well as for multivariate random fields.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.