Stable Canonical Rules for Intuitionistic Modal Logics
Abstract
This paper develops stable canonical rules for intuitionistic modal logics, which were first introduced for superintuitionistic logics and transitive nor mal modal logics in [1] and [2] respectively. We first prove that every in tuitionistic modal multi-conclusion consequence relation is axiomatizable by stable canonical rules. This allows us to assume, without loss of generality, that rules considered by us are stable canonical ones. The idea turns out to be useful. In particular, using stable canonical rules, we get an alterna tive proof of the Blok-Esakia theorem for intuitionistic modal logics which was first proved in [3] and generalize it to multi-conclusion consequence re lations. We also prove the Dummett-Lemmon conjecture for intuitionistic modal multi-conclusion consequence relations, which, as far as we know, is a new result.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.