Constraining cross sections for unstable 153,159Gd(n,γ) and their astrophysical implications

Abstract

Neutron capture (n,γ) cross sections of Gadolinium (Gd) isotopes are critical to astrophysics research, nuclear reactor designs, and medical applications. However, the available (n,γ) data on unstable Gd isotopes are scarce and direct measurement is challenging. In this work, we propose an approach to infer the (n,γ) cross sections for unstable 153,159Gd isotopes by constraining both the γ-ray strength functions (γSFs) and nuclear level densities (NLDs). Specifically, the key γSF parameters are adjusted to match the available experimental data, and the NLD parameters are determined by renormalizing microscopic level densities through a Bayesian optimization method. Our approach is verified by comparing our predictions with the experimental (n,γ) data for the stable 155,157Gd isotopes. We then infer the unstable 153,159Gd(n,γ) cross sections within the neutron energy range of 0.01--5.0 MeV. The resulting uncertainty is about 30\%, which is significantly reduced by a factor of 5.5 compared to a large uncertainty of 167\% predicted with different nuclear models in TALYS. We further calculate the astrophysical reaction rates for the 153,159Gd isotopes. It is found that the 159Gd(n,γ) rate is larger by a factor of 2.9 than the JINA REACLIB recommendation. This enhancement increases the neutron capture branching ratio at 159Gd. Consequently, the resulting 160Gd abundance is increased by a factor of 2 compared to predictions using the JINA REACLIB rate in s-process nucleosynthesis simulations. Our approach is promising for extracting (n,γ) data on a wider range of unstable isotopic chains as well as for essential astrophysical reaction network calculations and nuclear science applications.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…