How fast does the range of simple random walk grow?
Abstract
Consider a discrete-time simple random walk (Xt)t 0 on an infinite, connected, locally finite simple graph G, and let \[ Rt := |\X0,…,Xt\| \] denote its range. The main result of this revised note is that positive vertex isoperimetry already forces linear expected range, with no bounded-degree assumption: if \[ ιV(G) := ∈f0<|S|<∞ |∂V S||S| >0, \] then x Rt c(G)(t+1) for every starting vertex x and every t 0. The proof is direct: vertex expansion implies an unweighted Dirichlet inequality, which in turn gives a uniform positive escape probability from every vertex. We also record a finite counterpart: in an n-vertex finite vertex expander, the expected hitting time of an independent stationary random target is Θ(n), again with no restriction on degrees. We also record a chain of geometrically growing lollipops for which \[ o Rt t1/3, \] so the subdiffusive exponent 1/3 need not be accompanied by superdiffusive oscillations. In particular, for this graph the lower and upper logarithmic exponents of oRt are both equal to 1/3. Finally, since Barnes and Feige proved the sharp universal estimate Tn= O(n3) for the n-th discovery time, we move our elementary proof of the weaker bound Tn=O(n3 n) to a later section as a short self-contained argument with a logarithmic loss. We close with a related bounded-degree mixing statement: if the lazy walk has worst-case mixing time m, then at least c m starting vertices are still noticeably unmixed at time m/2. This final result uses the same commute-time/effective-resistance control of connected sets that appears throughout the paper.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.