RG-Invariant Symmetry Ratio for QCD: A Study of U(1)A and Chiral Symmetry Restoration

Abstract

We introduce a renormalization-group invariant observable, the symmetry strength parameter AB, for the quantitative characterization of symmetry breaking in QCD. As a first application, we employ AB to investigate the relative strength of SU(2)L × SU(2)R chiral symmetry and U(1)A axial symmetry breaking in Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD using optimal domain-wall fermions at the physical point. Our study covers three lattice spacings and twelve temperatures in the range 164-385~MeV. We examine three independent symmetry-breaking channels in the nonsinglet sector with quark-connected correlators: the U(1)A-sensitive scalar-pseudoscalar channel (PS), probing the π-δ system; the SU(2)L × SU(2)R-sensitive vector--axial-vector channel (VA), probing the -a1 system; and an additional U(1)A-sensitive tensor--axial-tensor channel (TX), probing the T-b1 system. At finite lattice spacing, we observe a clear hierarchy PS > VA > TX. A controlled continuum extrapolation reveals that this hierarchy collapses, with all three symmetry-breaking strengths becoming statistically indistinguishable within our precision. This result provides a new, model-independent benchmark from a chirally symmetric lattice action. Our findings indicate that the effective restoration scales for SU(2)L × SU(2)R and U(1)A in the nonsinglet sector converge closely near the chiral crossover, placing stringent quantitative constraints on the temperature window for chiral and axial symmetry breaking in quark-connected channels. These results support a two-stage restoration scenario, in which full symmetry restoration -- including the singlet sector -- occurs only at significantly higher temperatures once topological fluctuations are sufficiently suppressed.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…