Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Subgrid Prescription from First Principles

Abstract

Understanding how supermassive black holes (BHs) couple to their host galaxies across a vast spatial and temporal dynamic range remains a central challenge in galaxy evolution. Using the multizone framework -- designed to capture bidirectional inflow--outflow from the event horizon to the Bondi scale -- we present a suite of long-duration GRMHD simulations spanning BH spins |a|=0--0.9 and Bondi radii RB/rg=4×102--2×106. From these simulations we derive spin-dependent subgrid prescriptions from first principles, applicable to hot accretion flows with low-Eddington ratios (f Edd10-3), for adoption in cosmological simulations and semi-analytic models. We provide compact analytic fits for the time-averaged accretion rate M(RB,a) and feedback power E fb(RB,a) with respect to the Bondi rate MB, which are largely insensitive to the initial gas configuration and magnetic field strength. To capture intrinsic time-variability, we also quantify the full distributions of M and feedback efficiency η, both well described by lognormal statistics, with widths that increase toward larger RB. We further measure self-consistent spin evolution in the hot accretion mode, finding that the spin-up parameter varies as s(a) -3.7\,a, which implies a very long spindown timescale ts 12(10-3/f Edd)\, Gyr. Thus, BH spins are effectively frozen during phases of quiescent accretion. Compared to conventional small-domain GRMHD calculations, our simulations, which reach dynamical equilibrium across horizon-to-galaxy scales, yield systematically different long-term accretion, feedback, and spin properties, cautioning against direct extrapolation from small-scale GRMHD simulations when constructing galactic-scale subgrid models.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…