Constraining β-Exponential Inflation with the latest ACT observations

Abstract

Recent observations from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), especially when combined with DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data, indicate a scalar spectral index ns higher than the value reported by Planck 2018, placing tension on universal inflationary attractor models. Motivated by this discrepancy, we investigate the inflationary predictions of the β-exponential potential, V(φ)=V0(1-λβφ/Mp)1/β considering both minimally and non-minimally coupled realizations. This potential generalizes standard exponential inflation and naturally arises in braneworld scenarios. We derive analytical expressions for the slow-roll parameters and inflationary observables using a perturbative expansion in the non-minimal coupling , and validate these results through numerical calculations. In the minimally coupled case, the model predicts ns 0.976 and r 0.035 for N=50 and moderate values of β, remaining compatible with ACT+DESI constraints at the 1σ level while yielding a spectral tilt larger than the universal attractor prediction. Introducing a small non-minimal coupling significantly improves agreement with observations by suppressing the tensor-to-scalar ratio while preserving the enhanced scalar tilt. For N=60, λ 0.3-0.5, and β O(1-5), the non-minimally coupled model yields ns 0.974-0.976 and r 0.03, comfortably consistent with ACT, DESI, and BICEP/Keck bounds. Our results show that the β-exponential potential, especially when implemented with a non-minimal coupling, exhibits good agreement with the latest CMB observations. Our inflationary predictions of the non-minimal model of ns and r confirming the leading-order contributions in are sufficient to capture the essential features of both r and ns in observationally relevant regimes.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…