Why measurements are made of effects
Abstract
Both in quantum theory and in general probabilistic theories, measurements with n outcomes are modelled as n-tuples of effects summing up to the unit effect. Why is this the case, and can this assumption be meaningfully relaxed? Here we develop generalized measurement theories (GMTs) as a mathematical framework for physical theories that is complementary to general probabilistic theories, and where this kind of question can be made precise and answered. We then give a definition of probabilistic state on a GMT, prove that measurements are made of effects in every GMT in which the probabilistic states separate the measurements, and also argue that this separation condition is physically well-motivated. Finally, we also discuss when a GMT should be considered classical and characterize GMTs corresponding to Boolean algebras as those that are strongly classical and projective.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.