Non-commutative rings with infinitely many maximal subrings

Abstract

We study rings with infinitely (only finitely) many maximal subrings. We prove that if M is a maximal left/right ideal of a ring T which is not an ideal of T, and R is the idealizer of M, then T has at least |R/M|+1 maximal left/right ideals which are not an ideal of T; in particular T has at least |R/M|+1 distinct maximal subrings. Moreover, if T is a K-algebra over an infinite field K, then either T has infinitely many maximal subrings or T is a quasi duo ring with certain algebraic properties similar to commutative rings. We prove that for a simple ring R, the ring R× R has only finitely many maximal subrings if and only if R is finite. Also we study rings which are integral over their centers and have only finitely many maximal subrings. We prove that if T is integral over its center and T has more than 20 maximal (left/right) ideals, then T has infinitely many maximal subrings. In particular, we see that if a J-semisimple ring T is integral over its center and has only finitely many maximal subrings, then T embeds in S× Πi∈ IEi, where each Ei is an absolutely algebraic field and S is a finite semisimple ring. We see that if T is a left Noetherian algebraic K-algebra over an infinite field K and T has only finitely many maximal subrings, then T is a countable left Artinian ring which is integral over Zp, where p=Char(K). We exactly determine when T=Πi∈ IMni(Ei), where each Ei is a field and ni∈N, has only finitely many maximal subrings. We see that if R is an infinite Artinian ring, then Mn(R), n>1, and R× R have infinitely many maximal subrings.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…