Martingale Posterior Predictive Coherence: Hausdorff Moment Hierarchy
Abstract
For an exchangeable Bernoulli sequence with de Finetti mixing measure Pi, the k-step predictive probability P(Xn+1=...=Xn+k=0 | Fn) equals the posterior expectation E[(1-theta)k | Fn]. By binomial expansion, this depends on all posterior moments up to order k. We show that the first moment alone is not sufficient to uniquely identify these quantities: for k >= 2, the mapping from posterior mean to k-step predictive is set-valued. The martingale posterior framework of Fong, Holmes, and Walker (which constrains only the first conditional moment of the terminal value) does not, in general, uniquely identify multi-step predictive distributions. Under any strictly proper scoring rule, the plug-in predictive is strictly dominated by the Bayes predictive whenever the posterior is non-degenerate. A closure theorem establishes that a martingale posterior determines all k-step predictives if and only if the conditional law of the terminal value is uniquely specified. Hill's A(n) rule under the Jeffreys Beta(1/2,1/2) prior is a positive example. The discrepancy is O(Var(theta | Fn)) and vanishes as the posterior concentrates. These results clarify the structural requirements for predictive completeness under exchangeability.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.