Non-Existence of Some Function-Correcting Codes With Data Protection
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the recently introduced concept of function-correcting codes (FCCs) with data protection, which provide a certain level of error protection for the data and a higher level of protection for a desired function on the data. These codes are denoted by (f\!:\!dd,df)-FCC, where dd is the minimum distance of the code and df denotes the minimum distance between those codewords that correspond to different function values of a function f:Fqk Im(f), with df ≥ dd. We use a distance graph on a code based on the pairwise distances of its codewords, and show conditions under which a code cannot work as a strict (f\!:\!dd,df)-FCC, that is, code for which df > dd. We then consider some well-known classes of codes, such as perfect codes and maximum distance separable (MDS) codes, and show that they cannot be used as strict (f\!:\!dd,df)-FCCs.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.