A homological generalized Property R conjecture is false

Abstract

The generalized Property R conjecture (GPRC) predicts that if framed surgery on an n-component link L in S3 produces \#n (S1× S2), then L is handleslide equivalent to an unlink, the obvious way to construct such a surgery. Many potential counterexamples to the GPRC are known, but obstructing handleslide equivalence is a tricky proposition. In this vein, we disprove a further generalization of the GPRC. It would be reasonable to expect that if an n-component link in S3 surgers to the connected sum of n three-manifolds with the homology of S1 × S2, then this link should be handleslide equivalent to an n-component split link, the obvious way to construct such a surgery. However, we prove that there are 2-component framed links in S3 that surger to a connected sum of homology S1× S2's but that are not handleslide equivalent, or even weakly handleslide equivalent, to a split link.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…