Systematic study of superheavy nuclei within a microscopic collective Hamiltonian: Impact of quantum shape fluctuations

Abstract

The even-even superheavy nuclei with 104 ≤slant Z ≤slant 126 and N≤slant 258 have been investigated using a microscopic five-dimensional collective Hamiltonian (5DCH) based on constrained triaxial relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov calculations with the PC-PK1 density functional. The 5DCH approach effectively captures the characteristic of isospin dependence of nuclear binding energies, two-nucleon separation energies, and α-decay energies across isotopic chains and demonstrates consistent accuracy as Z increases, underscoring the model's predictive power. The collective potentials, average quadrupole deformations, and characteristic collective observables: E(2+1), R42, and B(E2; 2+1 0+1) reveal a shape transition from well-prolate deformation around N=150 and N=210 to medium-deformed γ-soft shape around N=176 and N=246, and finally to a spherical shape near N=184 and N=258 for the isotopic chains with 104≤slant Z≤slant 118. Oblate deformations are favored for Z≥slant 120 isotopes around N=178. Remarkably, for a substantial range of transitional superheavy nuclei with N184 and N240, no 0+ states bounded by the fission saddles are predicted within their very shallow potential wells due to quantum shape fluctuations (QSFs). Additionally, sharp variations predicted for two-neutron separation energies S2n and α-decay energies Qα at N=184 and 258 in mean-field calculations are significantly reduced and shifted to N=182 and 256 in the 5DCH calculations, which is caused by the rapid evolution of the dynamical correlation energies related to QSFs around the nuclear spherical shells.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…