Background-level reconstruction of scalar-field potentials from dark-energy histories and comparison with analytic potential families

Abstract

We present a unified background-level framework that maps a prescribed late-time dark-energy density history ρ de(z) onto an effective scalar-field description in a spatially flat FLRW universe. Working directly with ρ de(z), we reconstruct the associated field trajectory ϕ(z), and field-space potential V(ϕ), together with a null energy condition (NEC) consistency check. We apply the method to three benchmark histories: (i) the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) form; (ii) a smooth mirror AdS→dS sign-switching profile in which ρ de crosses zero at z, interpolating between a positive late-time plateau and a negative high-z plateau (Λ sCDM-like at the background level); and (iii) a shifted- emergent profile that remains positive definite and approaches ρ de 0+ at high redshift. Finally, treating the reconstructed potential, V tar(ϕ), as a target, we perform Bayesian model comparison directly in potential space and rank representative analytic potential families by their Bayesian evidence. For CPL (restricting to the single-valued phantom branch for the potential-space comparison), the exponential potential has the highest evidence in the baseline analysis, while the shifted- and hilltop quartic forms remain close competitors; for the sign-switching target, the shifted- potential is strongly preferred, and the emergent profile yields the same qualitative ranking. These results provide a practical dictionary between phenomenological expansion histories and the scalar-field potential shapes required to reproduce them at the background level.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…