Resolving anomalous collectivity in the 41+ to 21+ transition of 58Fe

Abstract

The low-excitation states of atomic nuclei in the region around the N = Z = 28 shell closure are generally well described by the shell model. Most experimental observables in the iron isotopes 56Fe, 58Fe, and 60Fe (Z = 26; N=30, 32, 34) support a shell-model description. However, the lifetimes of the 41+ state in 58Fe in the literature result in a reduced transition strength that deviates markedly from shell-model predictions. There are three independent measurements, all in agreement and all based on the Doppler Shift Attenuation Method (DSAM) or Doppler-Broadened Line Shape method (DBLS). In this work, Coulomb-excitation measurements were performed on 56Fe and 58Fe beams to determine the ratios B(E2; 41+ 21+)/B(E2; 21+ 01+). Thus, B(E2; 41+ 21+) is determined relative to the known B(E2; 21+ 01+) values. For 56Fe, B(E2; 41+ 21+) = 23(4) W.u., agreeing with the adopted value. However, for 58Fe, the B(E2; 41+ 21+) values obtained (for the various combinations of matrix element signs that could not be firmly established) are all significantly lower than the value derived from the previous lifetime measurements, and are in accord with shell-model calculations. The 1978 DSAM measurement of Bolotin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 311, 75 (1978), has been re-examined. The discrepancy between that measurement and the Coulomb-excitation measurement can be ascribed to the Lindhard-Scharff-Schitt (LSS) electronic stopping powers adopted for the DSAM analysis, which considerably overestimate contemporary values. Evidently, lifetime measurements from that era that are based on LSS stopping powers should be used with caution. The revised lifetime data, incorporating current stopping powers, are compared with shell-model calculations.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…