Exclusive D D pair production with low invariant mass in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC

Abstract

We present predictions for the ultraperipheral heavy-ion reaction Pb Pb Pb Pb D D, where D refers to either D0 or D+, limiting to low invariant mass of D D and at energies available at the LHC. The calculation of the γ γ D D subprocess is done including the continuum mechanisms and the c0(3860) and c2(3930) resonant contributions. These states are considered as candidates for the first excited P-wave charmonia c0(2P) and c2(2P). We compare our results for the γ γ D D process with the D D invariant mass and angular distributions measured by the Belle and BaBar experiments in e+e- collisions. Then, we present first calculations for ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions (UPCs) within the equivalent photon approximation in the impact-parameter space. Both, the total cross section and several differential distributions for experimental cuts corresponding to the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, and LHCb experiments are presented. For instance, the nuclear cross sections for the D0 D0 and D+ D- channel at sNN = 5.02 TeV are found to be approximately 100--132 μb and 29 μb, respectively, taking into account the cuts on pseudorapidities and transverse momenta of the final state charmed mesons (|ηD| < 2.5, pt,D > 0.2 GeV) and for MD D < 4.3 GeV. Results for sNN = 5.36 TeV are also presented. Cross section for the Pb Pb Pb Pb (γ γ c0,2(2P) D D) processes is sufficiently large for experimental studies. The back-to-back correlation between charm mesons can be used to separate the exclusive process under consideration from other background processes, and could provide valuable insight into the properties of the excited quarkonia.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…