Beyond compactness: a structural-dynamical-evolutionary manifold for the stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio in ultra-compact massive galaxies

Abstract

Ultra-compact massive galaxies (UCMGs) exhibit elevated stellar-to-dynamical mass ratios when dynamical masses are estimated using standard virial prescriptions. This discrepancy has been interpreted as non-homology driven by their compactness. This study investigates how the stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio depends on compactness (C), velocity dispersion ($\sigma_*$), stellar population properties (age, metallicity, and [Mg/Fe]), and star formation histories (SFHs). The analysis is based on a homogeneous sample of 482 UCMGs from the INSPIRE and E-INSPIRE surveys, extending to smaller sizes than previously analysed samples. I first derive the compactness-mass relation assuming a constant virial coefficient (K=5). I then correct stellar masses for IMF variations and recompute stellar-to-dynamical mass ratios using an empirical prescription where the virial coefficient varies with radius and stellar mass. Finally, I test modulation by stellar kinematics and population properties, including the degree of relicness (DoR), quantifiying the extremeness of the SFH. A statistically significant anti-correlation between compactness and the IMF-corrected stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio is recovered under a constant virial coefficient, but the relation flattens when a structure-dependent K is adopted. The data define a structural-dynamical manifold in the logC-log$\sigma_*$ space. Velocity dispersion sets the dominant axis of variation, and the corresponding plane accounts for ~62% of the variance in stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio. The stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio in UCMGs is governed primarily by the depth of the gravitational potential traced by $\sigma_*$, rather than C alone. At fixed size, systems with higher velocity dispersion show lower stellar-to-dynamical mass ratios. Non-homology therefore reflects coupled dynamical and evolutionary processes rather than purely geometric compactness.