Grassmannian cluster subcategories and positroid varieties

Abstract

A class of subcategories GP B of the Grassmannian cluster category CM Ck, n was constructed by Jensen--King--Su from certain superorders B of Ck, n, which they showed are in bijection with Grassmannian positroids of type (k, n). We prove that GP B admits a cluster substructure of CM Ck, n, giving rise to a cluster algebra Aclu. This naturally raises questions regarding the relationship of Aclu to C[Gr(k, n)] and to the coordinate ring of the positroid variety associated to B. Using the cluster substructure, we show that the ice Gabriel quiver QU of a cluster tilting object U∈ GP B, consisting of rank one modules, is a subquiver of QT with T a cluster tilting object in CM Ck, n containing U as a summand. We also deduce that Aclu is a subalgebra of C[Gr(k, n)]. Moreover, applying a result of Canakci--King--Pressland on the Gabriel quiver QU in the case where B is connected (i.e., has no repeated direct summands), we deduce that QU, for arbitrary B, coincides with the quiver constructed by Muller-Speyer from a plabic graph whose face labels agree with the indices of the indecomposable summands of U. Consequently, the localised algebra (Aclu)B is isomorphic to the cluster algebra AMS of Muller-Speyer. We then construct bases for certain subalgebras and for an ideal of C[Gr(k, n)], and apply these to prove that (Aclu)B is naturally isomorphic to the coordinate ring of the open positroid variety. As a consequence, we obtain a new proof of Galashin--Lam's Theorem, identifying AMS with the coordinate ring of the open positroid variety, which was originally conjectured by Muller-Speyer. In the connected case, we note also that Pressland gave a categorification of the cluster structure following Galashin-Lam.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…