Prophet Inequalities with Delayed and Uncertain Acceptance

Abstract

We introduce the prophet inequality with delayed and uncertain acceptance, a variant of the classical prophet inequality in which a decision-maker sequentially evaluates options whose acceptance is uncertain and whose outcome is revealed only after a fixed delay. That is, at each time step, the decision-maker observes the realized value of the arriving option and must irrevocably decide whether to attempt to select it or to continue searching. If an option is attempted to be selected, the process is suspended for a fixed delay d, during which no other options can be considered. Once the delay expires, the selection succeeds with a known probability. If successful, the decision-maker receives the realized value and the process terminates; otherwise, the search resumes. In addition to the online decision-maker, we consider two stronger benchmarks: the value-aware decision-maker, who knows all value realizations in advance but not the acceptance outcomes, and the prophet, who knows both the values and the acceptance realizations. We characterize the competitive ratios between the two decision-makers and the prophet, showing that each is lower bounded by 1/(d+2), and we construct instances demonstrating that these bounds are tight for two of the comparisons. In the extreme case of no delay (d=0), where our result recovers the classical 1/2-competitive guarantee, we establish the tightness of the remaining competitive ratio and identify sufficient conditions under which the value-aware decision-maker can beat the 1/2 barrier against the prophet. In particular, we show that this occurs whenever all acceptance probabilities are strictly positive, by reducing the problem to a classical prophet inequality instance over appropriately scaled Bernoulli random variables.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…