Low-Frequency Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background in Gaia DR3 catalog

Abstract

We investigate the potential to detect low-frequency gravitational waves (GWs) through their imprints on the proper motions of distant quasars observed by the Gaia mission. Using astrometric data from Gaia DR3, we simulate the effect of GWs on the proper motions of quasars, incorporating their actual sky positions and measurement uncertainties. We investigate two closely related data analysis techniques for the extraction and characterization of GW signals from quasar proper motions: Vector Spherical Harmonics (VSH) and angular correlation functions, commonly referred to as Hellings-Downs curves (HDC). Using realistic simulated data, we forecast their sensitivity and accuracy to GWs, and evaluate the impact of systematic errors. From these simulations, we derive an upper limit on the amplitude of a stochastic GW background, constrained by the observational timespan, astrometric precision, and the sky distribution of quasars. VSH decomposition appears less sensitive to uneven sky sampling and anisotropic noise. The HDC approach retains a larger fraction of the pairwise correlation information and therefore exhibits higher raw statistical sensitivity under idealized conditions. We find that, with Gaia DR3 proper motion errors, the lower limit for a detectable GW strain is of 10-11, with possible improvements to about 3 x 10-12 for the next Gaia Data Release 4 (for the same number of quasars). This limit holds for a stochastic GW spectrum integrated over all frequencies less than half the inverse of the 34-month observational timespan of Gaia DR3, corresponding to approximately 5.6 nHz. We also investigate how different data-restriction and weighting schemes influence the final estimate of the gravitational wave strain.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…