An Opacity-Free Test of the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Wave Signals with Space-Based Detector Networks
Abstract
The cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR), expressed as dL(z) = (1+z)2 DA(z), is a fundamental relation in modern cosmology. In this work, we apply a method to test the CDDR using simulated strongly lensed gravitational-wave (SLGW) signals from massive binary black holes (MBBH) as observed by proposed space-based detector networks. Our analysis is conducted under the point-mass lens model, considering the strong lensing scenario that produces two images. We generate 90 days of simulated SLGW data for 10 events based on the Population III stellar formation model, with source redshifts in the range zs ∈ [2,6] and lens redshifts in zL ∈ [0.2,1]. The deviation of CDDR is parameterized by η1(z) = 1 + η0 z and η2(z) = 1 + η0 z/(1+z), and we incorporate the deviation parameter η0 directly into the waveform model. Parameter estimation is performed within a Bayesian statistical framework, combining simulated data from both Taiji and LISA. For a single lensed event, the joint Taiji+LISA analysis improves the measurement precision of η0 by roughly a factor of two compared with Taiji-only observations. By combining 10 simulated events, the population-level constraints on η0, quantified by the half width of the 95\% credible interval, reach approximately 2.61×10-4 (1.72×10-4) for the η1(z) parameterization and 1.22×10-3 (6.86×10-4) for η2(z) in the Taiji-only (Taiji+LISA) scenario, respectively. The inferred values of η0 remain consistent with η0 = 0 within the estimated uncertainties, with no statistically significant evidence for deviations from the CDDR at the achieved precision. These results demonstrate the significant advantage of joint space-based observations for high-precision tests of the CDDR.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.