Thermally inflated accretors in post-mass transfer binaries: Abell 35 and its class revisited

Abstract

A small but growing class of binaries containing hot (T eff105~K) white dwarfs (WDs) and rapidly rotating, apparently subgiant companions -- including the prototype, Abell 35 -- show companions that are too large and luminous to be ordinary main-sequence stars yet too numerous to be explained as finely tuned near-twin binaries. We argue that these stars are instead main-sequence accretors temporarily inflated out of thermal equilibrium by recent mass transfer. For the subgiant of Abell 35, a new Gaia DR3 astrometric orbit (P orb = 790 d) combined with updated photometric and spectroscopic constraints yield T eff ≈ 4900~ K, R ≈ 3~R, near-solar metallicity, and rapid rotation aligned with the orbit (v rot ≈ 195~ km~s-1), indicating substantial recent accretion and spin-up. Dynamical mass limits disfavor a coeval twin-binary origin, supporting the inflated-accretor interpretation. We test this scenario using self-consistent MESA binary evolution calculations with a new accretion prescription in which accreted material retains a fraction of its infall energy. The accretor expands to giant-like radii when M is high yet remains within its Roche lobe, allowing stable mass transfer even for mass ratios traditionally considered unstable. After mass transfer ceases, the star contracts on Myr timescales through a bloated, rapidly rotating phase whose temperatures, radii, and spins match those observed in Abell 35-type systems. This framework explains the population without fine tuning and unifies Abell 35-type binaries with post-AGB binaries, blue lurkers, and wide WD+main-sequence systems as successive stages of the same post-mass-transfer evolutionary pathway.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…