Distinct transverse-response signatures of retained-spin, eliminated-spin, and polynomial Burnett-type surrogate closures

Abstract

High-curvature observables in incompressible flows, including k4-weighted spectra, can arise from explicit internal rotation, elimination of a fast spin variable, or polynomial higher-gradient closure. Building on a retained-spin micropolar closure derived separately from the Boltzmann--Curtiss equation, we show that these mechanisms are dynamically distinguishable in transverse linear response. In a fast-spin regime the retained-spin theory reduces to a one-field model with a rational k-dependent kernel whose low-k expansion generates k4 and k6 terms, while preserving the large-k roll-off of the eliminated degree of freedom. We compare four closures: incompressible Navier--Stokes, a polynomial Burnett-type surrogate, the explicit-spin micropolar theory, and the eliminated-spin rational-kernel theory. The explicit-spin theory has two poles, the eliminated-spin theory retains only the slow pole, and finite polynomial truncations fail qualitatively: a strict k4 truncation becomes over-damped, while a matched k6 truncation develops near-critical amplification and finite-k instability. Many-particle event-driven simulations of perfectly rough spheres show that these observables are measurable and, in targeted campaigns, discriminating at the microscopic level: fixed-k and multi-k harmonic forcing resolve a finite spin-to-vorticity phase lag that strongly favors retained-spin dynamics over instantaneous adiabatic elimination, while the stronger-drive multi-k vorticity response rejects a pure k2 closure and favors the rational eliminated-spin kernel over a polynomial surrogate. Transverse response thus provides a practical diagnostic for separating retained rotational microphysics, eliminated-spin effective dynamics, and ordinary polynomial higher-gradient closures.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…