Finite-time blow-up of two (1+1)D systems rigorously derived from the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations

Abstract

We study two (1+1)-dimensional systems, denoted (R0) and (Z0), that are rigorously derived from the three-dimensional axisymmetric Euler equations in a signed polar formulation on the meridian plane. The main point of view in this revision is that these (1+1)D systems are not ad hoc model equations and not merely ``symmetry-axis reductions.'' Rather, they arise as exact symmetry-axis/apex restrictions of the full (1+2)D system~(E2) obtained from 3D axisymmetric Euler, and they already contain the core finite-time singularity mechanism of the full problem. The rev3 geometry is based on the symmetry axes \[ θ=0, θ= π2, \] for which ridge flatness is preserved automatically by the evenness in (r,z). Along these axes, and in particular at the apex x2=r2+z2=0, the reduced dynamics closes exactly. This yields two rigorously derived (1+1)D systems: the horizontal-axis system (R0) and the vertical-axis system (Z0). The apex trace of these systems reduces further to a closed ODE of Constantin--Lax--Majda type, from which we obtain finite-time blow-up at the coordinate origin. The paper has three main outputs. First, it derives the signed-polar (1+2)D subsystem~(E2) from the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations and identifies the exact (1+1)D systems (R0) and (Z0) carried by the symmetry axes. Second, it proves finite-time blow-up for the resulting apex dynamics and analyzes the associated convective axis reduction. Third, it derives the exact background--remainder equations and formulates a conditional nonlinear stability mechanism: if a compatible full background exists on [0,T) with the coefficient bounds required by the weighted energy method, then the full solution inherits the same finite-time apex blow-up.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…