Is the w0waCDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?
Abstract
We study the performance of the flat model and the dynamical dark energy parameterizations w0CDM and w0waCDM, in which the dark energy (DE) equation of state is either constant (w=w0) or redshift-dependent [w(z)=w0+wa z/(1+z)], without and with a varying CMB lensing consistency parameter AL, using combinations of Planck PR4 CMB data (PR4 and lensing), and a compilation of non-CMB data composed of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data that do not include DESI BAO data, Pantheon+ type Ia supernova observations, Hubble parameter measurements H(z), and growth rate fσ8 data. We also compare results from earlier Planck PR3 data with those obtained using PR4 data in order to assess the stability of cosmological constraints. For the largest data combinations, PR3/PR4+lensing+non-CMB, the cosmological parameters inferred from PR3 and PR4 data are consistent, almost all differing by 1σ or less. For the +AL model, we have AL=1.087 0.035 for PR3 and AL=1.053 0.034 (1.6σ above unity) for PR4, which indicates that the CMB lensing anomaly is reduced when PR4 data are used. For the w0 waCDM parameterization, we find w0 = -0.8630.060 (quintessence-like) and w0+wa=-1.37+0.19-0.17 (phantom-like), suggesting that the current observations favor dynamical DE over a cosmological constant at about 1.8σ. For the w0waCDM+AL parameterization, we find w0=-0.877 0.060 and w0 + wa =-1.29-0.17+0.20, corresponding to a preference for dynamical DE over a cosmological constant of about 1.5σ and with AL = 1.042 0.037 exceeding unity at 1.1σ. These results indicate that while the PR4 data mildly favor a time-evolving DE, part of this preference may be associated with possible residual excess smoothing present in the Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy spectra (abridged).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.