Non-split sharply 2- and 3-transitive groups in SLn( Z)

Abstract

We prove that SL3(Z) contains a non-split sharply 2-transitive subgroup, answering a question of Glasner and Gulko. We also prove that SL4(Z) contains a non-split sharply 3-transitive subgroup, but that SL3(Z) does not contain an infinite sharply 3-transitive subgroup.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…