The Quadratic State Cost of Classical Simulation of One-Way Quantum Finite Automata

Abstract

Generalized finite automata (GFAs), probabilistic finite automata (PFAs), and one-way general quantum finite automata (1gQFA) recognize the same strict-cutpoint languages, but the state complexity of exact probabilistic simulation has remained unclear. This paper determines that worst-case cost exactly: every \(n\)-state 1gQFA admits exact strict-cutpoint simulation by a one-way PFA with \(O(n2)\) states, via the standard \(n2\)-dimensional mixed-state linearization together with an explicit alphabet-preserving construction that converts each \(k\)-state GFA into a one-way PFA with at most \(2k+6\) states; conversely, for every \(n 2\), there exists an \(n\)-state 1gQFA for which every equivalent one-way PFA requires at least \(n2-1\) states, obtained from a prepare--test construction and a Vapnik--Chervonenkis dimension argument. Hence the worst-case probabilistic state cost of exact strict-cutpoint simulation is \((n2)\).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…