GW190711030756 and GW200114020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive analysis of GW190711030756 and GW200114020818, two of the most significant binary black hole merger candidates in the IAS catalog, with probabilities of astrophysical origin p astro=0.99 and 0.71, respectively, and signal-to-noise ratios of approximately 10.0 and 13.4. We employ numerical relativity surrogate models to infer both the source properties and the remnant properties of these two candidates. We find that both GW190711030756 and GW200114020818 are asymmetric-mass binaries, with inferred mass ratios of 0.35+0.32-0.15 and ≤ 0.20. In addition, GW200114020818 is inferred to have a source-frame total mass of approximately 220M and highly spinning black holes, with primary (secondary) dimensionless spin magnitudes of 0.96+0.03-0.07 (0.84+0.13-0.34), closely resembling GW231123135430. We further find that GW200114\020818 has a confidently negative effective inspiral spin of eff=-0.60+0.22-0.13 and exhibits strong spin precession, characterized by an effective precession parameter of p=0.60+0.21-0.19. GW200114020818 (when considered alongside GW231123135430) points towards an emerging population of massive, rapidly spinning BBH mergers. While GW231123135430 is consistent with mergers in globular clusters, producing systems like GW200114020818 in such environments remains difficult even under hierarchical merger scenarios. The probability that the remnant black hole of GW190711030756 (GW200114020818) is retained in its host environment is 0.079 (0.0002), 0.62 (0.965), and 0.997 (1) if the merger occurred in a globular cluster, a nuclear star cluster, or an elliptical galaxy, respectively.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…