A Dynamical Equilibrium Linking Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background to Cosmic Structure Formation

Abstract

The stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) is conventionally treated as a passive relic of its astrophysical and cosmological sources, with negligible back-reaction on the matter content of the Universe. Here we show that this assumption needs to be modified once the SGWB and matter are treated as a dynamically coupled non-equilibrium system. Combining linearized general relativity with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, we derive a generalized Langevin framework that drives the coupled system toward a dynamical equilibrium, which is characterized by a distinctive strain spectrum with a high-frequency cutoff W, and a scale-dependent coupling parameter that screens gravity progressively for the most massive structures. Three findings support this framework. Fitting the equilibrium spectrum to the NANOGrav 15-year dataset yields a Bayes factor of 48 3.8 over the supermassive black hole binary baseline, achieved entirely within general relativity and the Standard Model. The PTA-calibrated screening mass scale mc 1012--1014\,M overlaps, with no free cosmological parameter, the -derived linear-to-nonlinear transition mass M NL of cosmic structure at 8\,h-1\,Mpc. Most strikingly, promoting this concordance to a structural identification expresses W entirely in terms of M NL, and its inverse acquires a transparent physical reading as a coherence threshold for SGWB-matter coupling. W is thereby a derived quantity linking nanohertz gravitational-wave observables to the late-time cosmological sector. The framework makes distinctive scale-dependent predictions testable by forthcoming large-scale structure surveys and space-borne gravitational-wave observatories.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…