Global Persistence, Local Residual Structure: Forecasting Heterogeneous Investment Panels
Abstract
On a 93-actor quarterly panel mixing macro indicators, institutional data, and firm-level investment ratios, global factor augmentation degrades prediction for actor subgroups whose dynamics are misrepresented by the shared basis. A two-stage architecture -- global pooled AR(1) for shared persistence, block-specific local models for residual dynamics -- improves full-panel out-of-sample R2 from 0.630 to 0.677 ( = +0.047, CI [+0.036, +0.058], 10/10 windows, placebo p ≤ 0.001). A held-out decade test (block partition frozen on 2005--2014 data, evaluated on unseen 2015--2024 windows) confirms the gain ( = +0.050, 10/10), and a stratified placebo that fixes the macro/firm data-type split and permutes only firm-sector assignments corroborates (z = 7.25, p ≤ 0.001). Cross-regime replication on a 109-actor UK/EU heterogeneous panel ( = +0.017, 8/8 windows) and a combined US + UK/EU panel of 202 actors ( = +0.030, placebo z = 9.68 -- exceeding the original US-only z = 7.82) confirms the architecture transfers across regimes. A 146-firm CapEx/Assets robustness check refines the scope condition: the gain depends on cross-sectional dispersion in autoregressive structure, which data-type heterogeneity reliably produces but which is also present in firm-only panels under suitable ratio choices.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.