Blind Catalytic Quantum Error Correction: Target-State Estimation and Fidelity Recovery Without A Priori Knowledge

Abstract

Near-term quantum computers must protect fragile coherence against decoherence to deliver useful results. Catalytic quantum error correction (CQEC) addresses this challenge by amplifying residual coherence with a reusable catalyst, achieving threshold-free recovery whenever the target coherent modes survive in the noisy state. However, the original protocol requires complete knowledge of the ideal target -- an assumption that fails for variational and iterative algorithms whose output is unknown to the correction module. Here we show that this requirement can be removed by estimating the target from the noisy output alone, in a two-stage protocol we call blind CQEC. We benchmark five estimation strategies across three noise channels, four quantum algorithms (d = 4--64), Haar-random states up to d = 256, and mixed targets, and find that estimation and recovery fidelities are linearly correlated (r > 0.99); we prove an analytical Lipschitz bound Frec ≥ 1 - 2\|est - target\|1 that explains the correlation, derive a crossover dimension d* ≈ 25--40, and show that a tunable hybrid bridges the two regimes. Unlike error-mitigation methods (zero-noise extrapolation, probabilistic error cancellation, virtual distillation), blind CQEC returns the state itself rather than corrected expectation values, with single-copy overhead. A noisy-VQE demonstration for H2 yields 3.4× energy-error reduction, and a qiskit-aer circuit-level check confirms transfer to small circuits. These results identify the bottleneck of blind error correction as a classical estimation problem, opening a route to autonomous, threshold-free recovery in algorithms where pre-encoding is unavailable.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…