Detecting entanglement from few partial transpose moments and their decay via weight enumerators

Abstract

The p3-PPT criterion is an experimentally viable relaxation of the well-known positive partial transposition (PPT) criterion for the certification of quantum entanglement. Recently, it has been generalized to various families of entanglement criteria based on the PT moments pk=Tr[(ρΓ)k], where ρΓ denotes the partially transposed density matrix of a quantum state ρ. While most of these generalizations are strictly more powerful than the p3-PPT criterion, their m-th level versions usually rely on the availability of pk for all moment orders k m. Here, we show that one can alternatively compare any three PT moments of orders k<l<m, which can significantly reduce experimental overheads. More precisely, we show that any state satisfying pl>pkxpm1-x must be entangled, where x=(m-l)/(m-k). Using the example of locally depolarized GHZ states, we identify the most promising versions of these three-moment criteria and compare their performance with a broad range of entanglement criteria. In the case of globally depolarized stabilizer states, we prove that having access to pk for k 5 is sufficient to reproduce the full PPT criterion. More generally, we show that the Stieltjes-m criterion is as powerful as the PPT criterion whenever ρΓ has no more than (m+1)/2 distinct eigenvalues. Finally, we introduce a notion of quantum weight enumerators that capture the decay of pk under local white noise for arbitrary quantum states and illustrate this concept for an AME state. Our results contribute to the growing body of literature on higher-moment PPT relaxations and modern applications of weight enumerators in quantum error correction and information theory.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…